The Punch website vowed to "live blog" through tonight's first episode of John Safran's Race Relations on ABC1.
Well, what a heart-stopping, informative and poignant live blog it was - for example, there were gems like this;
And of course, there was this biting commentary from Punch blogger Tory Maguire;
Meanwhile, over on the ABC Mr Safran was reminding me why I hold him in such high esteem as a naughty, intelligent, witty documentary-maker.
Oh how I missed his work.
Like a true addict, I'm off to watch my box set of John Safran Versus God.
* Oh, and Racebook? Pure brilliance.
Showing posts with label race relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label race relations. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Safran Takes a Punch
ABC's head of television has advised conservative viewers to steer clear of John Safran's Race Relations tonight on ABC1.
Whilst warning those sensitive folk away, Kim Dalton did defend the show and its ideas;
"Innovation necessarily involves a willingness to take risks, to be inventive and open to fresh ideas ... It also means pushing boundaries - boundaries that some, often many, would prefer not to be pushed."
The Punch website not only published the commentary but will be blogging throughout the show tonight.
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Moral Panic Outrage
Hungry Beast did a great little piece on public outrage in this week's episode on ABC1. It outlined the process of moral panic amongst the general public.
I thought it was particularly interesting seeing all the fuss today about John Safran's new show Race Relations, set to start next week on ABC1. The Herald Sun had a poll asking if Safran's new show "breached boundaries of decency" - never mind that the show hasn't actually gone to air yet - the Australian public should be able to formulate a well-founded opinion based on ... well ... the Herald Sun article containing the poll, I assume.
On channel 10's The 7pm Project tonight they ran the story of the public's outrage over Race Relations. Dave Hughes pointed out that the Herald Sun poll earlier that day was 70% against the show and Safran's style of humour.
The poll at 8:11pm looked something like this;
I thought it was particularly interesting seeing all the fuss today about John Safran's new show Race Relations, set to start next week on ABC1. The Herald Sun had a poll asking if Safran's new show "breached boundaries of decency" - never mind that the show hasn't actually gone to air yet - the Australian public should be able to formulate a well-founded opinion based on ... well ... the Herald Sun article containing the poll, I assume.
On channel 10's The 7pm Project tonight they ran the story of the public's outrage over Race Relations. Dave Hughes pointed out that the Herald Sun poll earlier that day was 70% against the show and Safran's style of humour.
The poll at 8:11pm looked something like this;

So the cycle goes on and the moral panic continues tomorrow when those reacting to Dave Hughes' statement punch their fists proudly in the air and shout "Yeah! Me too!"
*** *** ***
Is it just me or is the moral panic becoming somewhat absurd? The fact that every little public event, performance, letter-opening or sneeze is being picked apart by Ma and Pa kettle is making it very difficult to make pleasant conversation at the water-cooler.
Example 1 - Today at work;
Example 1 - Today at work;
Me: "Hi, how are you?"
Pa Kettle: "Yeah good. Did you see that crap about hitting your kids with a wooden spoon? A bit of discipline never hurt anyone I say."
Me: (stupidly) "Could using a weapon to discipline them be a bit harsh though?"
Pa Kettle: "What?! A wooden spoon's not a weapon! Use whatever you need I say. Kids these days." (shakes head)
Example 2 - Later in the afternoon;
Ma kettle: "Can you believe that John Safran?"
Me: (stupidly) "What's going on?"
Ma kettle: "He's doing a blackface sketch on his new show!"
Me: "Hang on. But I thought the majority of Australia was for blackface humour?" (Could I have possibly misconstrued the 350 comments on The Daily Telegraph article last week?)
Ma kettle: "He's a disgrace that's what he is! They should take him off tv!"
Me: "But are you just saying that because you hate Jews?"
Ma kettle: "What?! he's Jewish too?"
Is all this outrage - directed at pretty much anything - making the issues that are actually worthy of discussion seem a bit, well, stupid? How can I be legitimately offended by the blackface skit if I don't really care whether dwarves dress up as jockeys and ride some crowd members at a racing carnival? If I have a penchant for skinny Jewish boys making fun of organised religion does that mean I should be all for hitting my child with random kitchen utensils?
... hang on, or should that be the other way around?
It seems like Australia is choosing sides and the battle lines aren't very well drawn out. Beware Australia; the water-cooler is no longer a safe place.
* One more thing; are all those people that joined the "I'm a fan of spooning" group on Facebook feeling awkward?
... hang on, or should that be the other way around?
It seems like Australia is choosing sides and the battle lines aren't very well drawn out. Beware Australia; the water-cooler is no longer a safe place.
* One more thing; are all those people that joined the "I'm a fan of spooning" group on Facebook feeling awkward?
at
7:42 PM
Labels:
abc,
daily telegraph,
dave hughes,
dwarves,
herald sun,
hungry beast,
john safran,
race relations,
religion,
the 7pm project
4
comments
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Welcome back John
Look, to be honest, I don't care who he's offending or what he's doing, there is something so darn attractive about a skinny Jewish boy with self-esteem problems poking fun at organised religion.
For the record, I'm down with that.
So here's a look at John Safran's next project for ABC:
It starts on Wednesday, October 21st.
For the record, I'm down with that.
So here's a look at John Safran's next project for ABC:
It starts on Wednesday, October 21st.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


