Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Social Media Etiquette

With the growing popularity of social networking sights like Facebook and Twitter - has the telephone become redundant? Why would you make a phone call to invite a few friends to dinner when you can post an update on your Facebook - saving you time, and the cost of the calls? We are now learning to communicate on a wholly different level to what we're used to and the rules of social networking have not yet been set in stone.

This got me thinking about what is acceptable behavior in social media. We all remember when SMS became popular and the old 'text breakup' was the ultimate in rejection. It seemed that not calling was better than "lets hve a brk ?" but since then text has pretty much morphed into an acceptable form of communication.

With online social networking being so new, the rules are a bit blurry. So what is and isn't acceptable? Here are just a few random observations I've made;

First of all - having a fight with someone on a status update is a big no. You know the one, where someone advises that they're upset, or insinuates another person in their unhappiness, and then that other person goes in for the kill to defend themselves. Whilst it's generally entertaining for the rest of us - it's also 'web-awkward' - in that you don't know whether to discuss said update with the person the next time you see them or, even worse, you commented on the update before the shit-fight started and are now inadvertently part of it.

Advising your family and friends of massive life changes on Facebook or Twitter is not kosher. Something like "mully just booked a three week trip to hawaii for next month!" is absolutely fine, whereas "mully will no longer be female as of next week - anyone up for a hospital run?" is not fine. Notifications like the latter might be acceptable for acquaintances, but close friends and family might need a phone call.

The next social networking faux pa is excessive introspection. No one needs to know every tiny little detail of your complex psyche. Of course, there's a fine line with this one - something like "mully wonders why humans are so shitty" is seemingly acceptable right? - but a series of updates following it containing details of said confusion and insinuations of depression at said lack of faith in humanity is boooooring. Phone a friend.

On the flip-side of this one is the "my life is f#cking awesome and you are so jealous" update. Whilst it's generally heart-warming to know your friends are doing well and are blissfully happy - after 17 updates in a row stating wealth, health and happiness - even the best of us have the potential to crumble into green-eyed-monsters.

Mind you, a bit of self-reflection and bragging is completely wonderful and interesting - but there's a fine line.

Then there's the profile pic. The semi-naked, suggestive pose is not acceptable under any circumstance - save those ones for Picture magazine. A good gauge of what is acceptable is considering whether your grandmother would be happy to put the picture on her bedside table (assuming her cataracts aren't too advanced).

And whilst we're on the topic of pics - it's not generally kosher to put a picture of yourself with someone else's partner as your profile. Unless you know the partner, and know that they're fine with it - leave that shit alone, lest you have a psychotic girlfriend/boyfriend stalk you and tear out your vital organs.

Posting pictures where you look fantastic but the other person looks like a troll is almost acceptable. But do you tag them? By tagging them it means that whenever they request 'friend' status with someone, that someone can see the horrific pictures. If someone tags you in a picture you don't like, you can un-tag yourself so it won't be linked to your profile ... but it will still be out there ... in infinite cyberspace. On the other hand, tagging them might be doing them a favour in that they're at least aware that the picture is out there ... somewhere.

You see, even in trying to outline some basic rules there are snags. That all being said, if an update is funny, it's generally forgiven all of the above.

So what do you think? Do you disagree? What do you love/hate about social media?

* please note, it could be the Gen X in me that makes me overly cautious about this newfangled "social" internet (- and of assuming people are interested in me or want to be my friend).
After all, we have been called the generation of underachievers - wink.

5 comments:

  1. I totally agree. There is a distinct lack of rules when it comes to social web-equitte. I think the reason people seem to be so open about everything is there is that sense of anonymity. It's like they think they live in their computer. The ironic thing, of course, is that everything they do on the web is fodder for anyone who owns a computer.
    Perhaps someone should write a rule book? Perhaps we should Mully..we would make a mint!!
    The other thing I find amusing is our paranoia about answering out mobiles when the number is withheld or private. What's up with that?? What did we do as kid's at home when the phone rang? I remember fighting my brothers and sisters for the privilege of answering our phone. How ironic that we are too paranoid to answer a call from an unknown entity but we re more than happy to post private (read semi-naked) photos of ourselves for all to see.
    It's a mad world Mully. Mad I tells ya

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're so right about not answering hidden numbers!!

    I fear no one would read a rule book - and by the time it was written, edited, published and promoted Facebook & Twitter would have been outdated by some new social networking site that made all the old rules obsolete! Perhaps our time would be better spent creating that new site ... - what are books anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I find some of those brag-fest status updates nauseating. I have this one family friend who CONSTANTLY feels the need to update on ANYTHING she is even CONTEMPLATING doing that's REMOTELY exciting ... or even not exciting. It's like she's trying to justufy that she's interesting or something. Or that she's 'so busy' all the time. Really irritating.

    I don't do bragging in the real world (or in Gen Y speak, IRL) but I hate that Facebook makes it more OK.

    I have also had fights with some random bogan friend of friends on Facebook. It was about the Matty Jihns saga, and they had me SO ANGRY dammit. In the end, I sounded like a rambling banshee. So good call on the no fights rule.

    What's your call on deleting friends from your list? I have done a few friend-culls to date. I have found it so refreshing actually - getting rid of all that dead wood! But is it rude when they realise I've disposed if them? I wonder...

    Thanks for the headsup Mully. Continue to love the blog, babe. x NJ

    On the flip-side of this one is the "my life is f#cking awesome and you are so jealous" update. Whilst it's generally heart-warming to know your friends are doing well and are blissfully happy - after 17 updates in a row stating wealth, health and happiness - even the best of us have the potential to crumble into green-eyed-monsters

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry, ignore that last paragraph. I was cutting and pasting one of your points ... and forgot to delete!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Haha - I hadn't even thought about the delete friend thing! Good point!

    A Facebook-savvy friend has advised me you can block annoying people from your news feed without actually deleting them - so then you don't have to put up with their annoying updates, but you're still on their friend list - thus avoiding awkward moments at the water-cooler!

    To be honest I don't really use Facebook a whole lot, I think Twitter is brilliant - not to tweet myself, but to follow others, particularly for news and the like.

    Social networking is certainly a novelty ... but I like to hang out with friends "IRL" ;)

    ReplyDelete