Thursday, October 15, 2009

Moral Panic Outrage

Hungry Beast did a great little piece on public outrage in this week's episode on ABC1. It outlined the process of moral panic amongst the general public.

I thought it was particularly interesting seeing all the fuss today about John Safran's new show Race Relations, set to start next week on ABC1. The Herald Sun had a poll asking if Safran's new show "breached boundaries of decency" - never mind that the show hasn't actually gone to air yet - the Australian public should be able to formulate a well-founded opinion based on ... well ... the Herald Sun article containing the poll, I assume.

On channel 10's The 7pm Project tonight they ran the story of the public's outrage over Race Relations. Dave Hughes pointed out that the Herald Sun poll earlier that day was 70% against the show and Safran's style of humour.

The poll at 8:11pm looked something like this;
















So the cycle goes on and the moral panic continues tomorrow when those reacting to Dave Hughes' statement punch their fists proudly in the air and shout "Yeah! Me too!"

*** *** ***

Is it just me or is the moral panic becoming somewhat absurd? The fact that every little public event, performance, letter-opening or sneeze is being picked apart by Ma and Pa kettle is making it very difficult to make pleasant conversation at the water-cooler.

Example 1 - Today at work;

Me: "Hi, how are you?"
Pa Kettle: "Yeah good. Did you see that crap about hitting your kids with a wooden spoon? A bit of discipline never hurt anyone I say."
Me: (stupidly) "Could using a weapon to discipline them be a bit harsh though?"
Pa Kettle: "What?! A wooden spoon's not a weapon! Use whatever you need I say. Kids these days." (shakes head)

Example 2 - Later in the afternoon;

Ma kettle: "Can you believe that John Safran?"
Me: (stupidly) "What's going on?"
Ma kettle: "He's doing a blackface sketch on his new show!"
Me: "Hang on. But I thought the majority of Australia was for blackface humour?" (Could I have possibly misconstrued the 350 comments on The Daily Telegraph article last week?)
Ma kettle: "He's a disgrace that's what he is! They should take him off tv!"
Me: "But are you just saying that because you hate Jews?"
Ma kettle: "What?! he's Jewish too?"

Is all this outrage - directed at pretty much anything - making the issues that are actually worthy of discussion seem a bit, well, stupid? How can I be legitimately offended by the blackface skit if I don't really care whether dwarves dress up as jockeys and ride some crowd members at a racing carnival? If I have a penchant for skinny Jewish boys making fun of organised religion does that mean I should be all for hitting my child with random kitchen utensils?

... hang on, or should that be the other way around?

It seems like Australia is choosing sides and the battle lines aren't very well drawn out. Beware Australia; the water-cooler is no longer a safe place.

* One more thing; are all those people that joined the "I'm a fan of spooning" group on Facebook feeling awkward?

4 comments:

  1. Im so confused. I don't know if i want to be PC or un PC anymore. Which is cooler??? Or should I say water cooler ???

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good point - I'm finding vague nodding and quick exits work well.

    The only PC war I'm sure of is the Mac v's PC one - in which case I'm a Mac girl ... but also own a PC ... oh what a tangled web we weave!

    ReplyDelete
  3. interesting post.

    all that noise & fury serves the function of distracting thick people from more important issues that they would then have to think about, consider at length and form a more educated opinion. affected indignation is so much more fun! (whether or not it's purposeful is a different issue, but it looks more malevolent when you start tracing the family tree of each media company.)

    the hey hey blackface vs safran blackface example is particularly demonstrative I think - we all have a great deal to say about race, but hardly any of it is interesting or thought out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Agreed digestif. There's also the element of protecting the norm; the 'unwashed masses' are predominantly creatures of habit - if something has always been funny to them (i.e. Red Faces) they are going to protect it as being funny because it is a safe normality. The Howard government exacerbated this with their 'alert but not alarmed' campaign which reinforced the fear of the 'other' - whether that 'other' is an evolved social conscience or an Afghani neighbour. The old "well my father beat me and I turned out okay" argument just doesn't cut it in civilised society.

    Popular Culture has always been associated with the uneducated and low socio-economic areas (a questionable association I agree) but there stands to reason that a person who doesn't want to read up on the history of Blackface would be happy for someone they see as 'educated' (maybe Andrew Bolt or Derryn Hinch) to formulate an opinion FOR them - it means that they too can 'have an opinion' and participate in the social shit-fight without actually having to know anything about the issue.

    It's much easier to be outraged about John Safran than to understand the complexities of the Emissions Trading Scheme!

    ReplyDelete