So totally like, random.

While I'm on the topic of gratuitous use of animals (see last post), channel 9's Random Acts of Kindness has put a Woodend animal shelter in hot water after renovations on the property didn't comply with Department of Primary Industry guidelines. Supposedly the programmers were advised of the guidelines, yet didn't comply with them.

Mind you, the proprietor Trish Burke did point out that the shelter was already in breach of guidelines relating to staff training and proper management of waste water - but she insists that the programs renovations are primarily what has alerted the DPI to the breaches. Hmmm.

It seems she was well aware that while she was enjoying her 'surprise trip' that the shelter was undergoing renovations. And she was obviously well aware that the shelter would be a focus of the program and eventually be aired on television - thus bringing it to the attention of the DPI in any case, including any breaches of the guidelines that were already happening.

So who has the duty of care to liaise with the DPI to ensure any renovations carried out meet guidelines? It seems the RAK producers wanted some sweet little fluffy kittens in soft-focus (sure to pull the audience heartstrings) but didn't worry about the technicalities. And it seems that the proprietor wanted a weekend away and a free renovation but didn't want to worry about the details.

The unfortunate thing is that the shelter might be closed. The animals are the ones paying the price - and they weren't even asked to sign the channel 9 waiver (although I wouldn't put it past the producers).

Perhaps RAK will in future be more mindful of the effects of their 'randomness'.